~ Quoted
from: Doc Conrad
Why you should not not use gravel on bottom of a pond.
In
any pond at any time, there are a range of bacteria present. These bacteria are consuming waste products to survive. Some
need oxygen to survive ... called aerobic bacteria and others do not. The latter are called anaerobic bacteria. In our pond
we want lots of aerobic and preferably very few anaerobic ones since the latter tend to be involved with infections and unpleasant
smelly situations.
If you have ever walked through the mud in a natural pond
you will have noticed a sulphurous type smell and this would have been the result of anaerobic bacteria living in the mud
(no oxygen there) and they metabolise using sulphur compounds amongst others.
It
makes sense therefore to create garden ponds to avoid or at least limit the possibility of creating stagnant areas where these
anaerobic bacteria can live and multiply.
Now consider a pond which has got
gravel on bottom (like you would see in an aquarium) and ask yourself what happens to any food or fish excretions that settle
down into the bottom of the pond ... yes of course they work their way down through the gravel where they build up in the
absence of oxygen since no fresh water containing oxygen can reach these dead spots. These regions become breeding grounds
for anaerobic bacteria. All sorts of problems can occur as a result.
In the
early days of pond keeping gravel bottoms were popular because there was not a full understanding of what happens in ponds
and the "technology" was based upon aquarium knowledge. The point about aquariums is that it is easy to vacuum the
gravel using a minitiature vacuum pump ... in a pond this cannot be done.
In
koi ponds great trouble is taken to ensure nothing stays on bottom of ponds through the use of bottom drains to minimize anaerobic
bacteria possibilities. Removal of debris this way is for appearance reasons of course too. Because of the need to avoid anaerobic
bacteria in pond water is a reason why sand filters are very bad for any type of pond ... dead anaerobic spots are inevitable
in a sand filter.
If you already have gravel on your pond bottom then do yourself
a favour and get rid of it before you create problems. The best time to do this now before water temperatures increase.( Southern
hemisphere of course)
Beware the Stagnation Zone in Your Pond Gravel and Rock Form Dead Zone
by Joseph F. Cuny
It has been brought to my attention that some pond builders (both Koi and water garden) apparently
are not familiar with basic pond design. In particular, I am referring to the use of gravel and rock inside the pond. As anyone
who has been a pond keeper for a few years knows, that is a real no no. Possibly this practice is a direct carryover from
the aquarium 'under gravel' filters, but it is a wrong application of the concept.
The problem is that the gravel and rock form a dead zone, more appropriately called a stagnation zone. Whether the
pond has fish in it or only plants, there are all kinds of organic material produced in the pond. This organic material gets
trapped in the stagnation zone and guess what happens? It stagnates! Since the water does not circulate very well in this
zone, the water is deficient in dissolved oxygen, and the organics are processed anaerobically. In other words, the organic
material rots or putrefies.
The end result of such putrefaction is the production
of noxious gases and disease organisms. I do not know what effect these would have on plants but they are deadly on fish and
are very unaesthetic. In time such a pond would smell like a cesspool! This is exactly what happens in an aquarium if the
under gravel filter is not cleaned regularly. Even with oxygenated water flowing through such a filter, there are dead spots
where the water does not flow and these have to be cleaned, usually with some type of vacuum or siphon system.
If it is necessary to put rocks on the bottom of a pond, possibly to simulate a natural stream,
they should be well separated and bedded in mortar to allow flow around them and to eliminate pockets where debris could accumulate.
The amount of work necessary to properly imbed gravel probably eliminates the use of gravel. If it is thought that the gravel
will function as a filter, it should be placed such that it can be fairly easily cleaned. Despite claims made by various people,
all filters must be cleaned. The only possible exception is the trickling filter type that is self cleaning, but in the process
dumps the waste into the following stage where it must be captured and disposed of.
I have seen gravel filters built into a sump in the bottom of a pond. Such a filter is almost impossible to clean,
and the resulting pond does not provide a healthy environment for the fish. With such a filter in a water garden, I would
expect the same type of problems. I realize that many people believe that the root system of the plants provides space for
the organisms that degrade the organic material, but this is not a suitable filter except for those organics that are soluble.
Even these, when aerobically digested, result in material that falls to the bottom where it joins the leaves, stems, decaying
roots, and so forth and then putrefies.
Joe Cuny is a founding editor and contributes
to KOI USA since its beginning, over 20 years ago.
We put rocks and gravel on the bottom
of the pond for a couple of reasons. The number one reason is for filtration of the pond. The rocks provide a huge amount
of surface area for the bacteria to colonize on. This bacterial breaks down the fish waste and other organic debris that fall
to the bottom. The second reason is to help lock the liner in place so that the water weight doesn't bring it down. The
third main reason is aesthetics.
The presence of rocks and gravel make it difficult to clean your pond.
Rocks
and gravel offer a natural place for aerobic bacteria to colonize and set up housekeeping. This bacteria breaks down the fish
waste and debris that would otherwise accumulate in the pond and turn into sludge. Regardless of your pond’s location
(i.e. close to trees and loads of leaves), or how many fish you have in it, you’ll find that having rocks and gravel
in your pond not only makes it look better, but it makes it healthier as well. So contrary to the myth, having rocks and gravel
on the bottom of your pond actually allows Mother Nature to clean up after herself.
There is more maintenance,
but I don't agree with the statement that rocks on the bottom is lethal to fish. I mean, as long as you don't have
a 10 inch layer of pebbles at the bottom. My pond has a very thin layer (1" or less) of rocks at the bottom just for
cosmetic reasons and no old debris below it since I vacuum it monthly. I think a black, plain bottom looks too unnatural.
My pond water has always tested PERFECT despite what others say about having rocks on the bottom. If you are willing to do
monthly maintenance, you will be fine. Even ponds without rocks on the bottom require some sort of weekly or monthly maintenance.
The fact is, fish eat and poop whether you have rocks or not. The poop gets trapped in the filters or settles on the bottom...Then
bacterial degrades it. So whether you have rocks or not...I don't think there's much of a difference.
Ponds
with natural bottoms - fish are ok despite mud and rocks on the bottom. Your pond will be ok with some pebbles/rocks on the
bottom. Just don't go overboard.
"Send your comments to me
at (NOTES TO DAVE) and I will be happy to post your responses on our site.. Thank you...."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------